Gefi, I think the concern was that their was an audio file...

Gefi, I think the concern was that their was an audio file claiming that it was repaid prior to "subsequent to period end". So we can probably trust the half yearly, but it means someone told porkies on tape. And if memory serves me correctly he knew it was a recorded interview.

Personally CCC need the money. So this repayment is not positive. But I guess RRS needed it too.

Has anyone clarified that the VMR offer for non-marketable parcels is a compulsory acquisition? Or is it just an offer to help small holders save brokerage?