Gee, I go out for the day to do some volunteer work, and what's been going on here........looks like a thumb fest....thanks everyone....but it is all OK really
In particular
@gamefisherman , thanks for the vote of confidence mate, but I think you might be stretching the truth a bit there.
@Dazzle101 thanks for the kind words Dale
And
@melenova it appears you are very wise just like your avatar photo.
Yes, I was a bit put out by
@Wyckoff SMI's first post, it certainly could have been done better, and seemed quite arrogant at the time, so I put the griller on for a bit in my next few posts (in the nicest possible way of course).
Truth be told Though, I am fully aware who the Wyckoff SMI is, and their history, How could I not - being such a strong supporter of Wyckoff analysis and its many and varied forms. I have also been receiving their weekly newsletter for a long time. And while I don't always agree with their analysis, or the unnecessary (IMO) use of indicators (don't worry, I don't always agree with David or Tom all the time either), I have sent quite a number of members and friends to their site for education when asked, and I know for certain at least one bought the Original Wyckoff course and completed it, because I helped along the way with some areas of difficulty.
Although it must be said that for the most part I encourage people to self educate for free on the net, to make sure they really want to immerse themselves in this type of analysis or training, before spending any hard earned money too soon in their learning curve.
And for the record, I am strongly aligned with both David Weis, and Tom Williams in particular (note- when I say Tom, I mean Tom, not Gav or TG), and also a little from Philip Friston, Dr Gary & Steve Phillips, and my analysis reflects this. I sort of use a mix of all these practitioners, along with my own thoughts and considerations when I trade, or post my thoughts .
Thanks again, more later
cheers
