WPL and FAR discussion, page-38

  1. 6,903 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 997
    Not true.
    The PE notice from COP did NOT contain all the information required for FAR tp PE [ according to FAR ] on the same terms as WPL.
    COP provided FAR with a PE notice....now claim that right does not even exist? This is the reason FAR now seek declaratory relief......does FAR have the right to PE or not. Very simple question.
    No one in their right mind would PE without all the required information which is required under the JOA, a legal contract and the PSC.
    FAR did the only thing they could do once COP had stonewalled for 3 months.
    The PSC sets out the process, FAR have followed it to the letter.

    If what you say is true then COP have caused this themselves.......could have offered it to FAR with a compliant notice and called their bluff? They didn't....you have to ask why?? There are only 2 reasons why IMO.
    1. There is something attached to the sale COP don't want anyone to know about or
    2. They were well aware FAR had a backer.
    Aimo DB
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.