Seuss your apathy as a non holder nor a supporter of...

Seuss your apathy as a non holder nor a supporter of shareholders trying for change and put some life into the company that they hold shares in is extraordinary.

Why should the new proposed board be informing all and sunder, they are only interested in seeing this company get some life back into it for the benefit of long suffering shareholders. All shareholders aligned to the shareholder group are aware of what needs to be done.

There is nothing sinister or hidden agendas, it is all about just getting the company relisted(yes there are shareholder funds to achieve this). There are quite a few avenues available for projects, but any decision on what they would be, would be up to a vote of the shareholders.

All nonholders when and if there is change will be able to make an informed decision on whether they wish to become shareholders in the company.

One thing I do believe is that with a change in management there will be more shareholder interaction, information, ability to vote on important items, and disclosure to the market.

Don't forget that there has never been a vote of shareholders on the Fiji project nor full disclosure of what it actually is or the cost associated to bring to fruition.

IMO DYOR.