Sinosteel warns EPA findings may threaten Mid West development
Kate Haycock
Wednesday, 3 June 2009
SINOSTEEL Midwest Corporation says the Environmental Protection Authority’s decision to not give full approval for its Blue Hills mining plan means the project may no longer be economically viable.
Surface iron ore at Koolanooka
The Chinese-backed company yesterday announced it had appointed a new chief operating officer, Giulio Casello, who would be dealing with the aftermath of the Western Australian EPA’s decision.
The previous COO, Bryan Oliver, will be retiring from the company.
Sinosteel planned to mine two areas at Blue Hills – Mungada East and Mungada West – which combined would produce around 3.17 million tonnes per annum, along with another 2.6Mt from the Koolanooka area, in the first phase of its mining operations, producing a total of 5.8Mtpa.
Phase two would see the company produce up to 15Mtpa from the Weld Range project area.
The EPA said yesterday it did not support the development of Mungada East and that the whole Mungada Ridge area should be reserved as an A class nature reserve.
Casello said in a statement the company was disappointed with the EPA’s findings and warned that the decision could jeopardise Sinosteel’s plans in the region.
“The EPA decision to not recommend approval for a part of the project makes it impossible for Sinosteel Midwest to progress the project economically,” he said.
“This is not only going to impact the company – it will also mean a loss of local jobs and contracts, purchasing from local businesses, community sponsorships and training programs, as well as the beneficial environmental offsets offered as part of the project.”
Casello also encouraged stakeholders in the project to take their comments to the EPA during the formal review period. There is a two-week public appeal period on the report, closing June 16.
In the meantime, Sinosteel Midwest will be reviewing the EPA’s comments and conditions.
The project will need ministerial approval and the EPA’s findings are open to an appeals process.
Sinosteel won control of Perth-based iron ore junior Midwest Corporation in July last year after beating off rival suitor Murchison Metals with a $US1.36 billion ($A2 billion) deal.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GWR
- will gwr now be a sinosteel target
will gwr now be a sinosteel target
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add GWR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
8.6¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $26.33M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 52317 | 8.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
8.9¢ | 16480 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 2216 | 0.100 |
1 | 40000 | 0.099 |
1 | 10000 | 0.098 |
1 | 7402 | 0.074 |
1 | 300000 | 0.035 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.110 | 60000 | 1 |
0.115 | 20000 | 1 |
0.120 | 6795 | 1 |
0.130 | 33334 | 1 |
0.140 | 16000 | 1 |
Last trade - 07.00am 04/12/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
GWR (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable