With all due respect I dont think you are qualified to comment on any small cap or speculative stock.
Before taking advice on RTA from this poster I would urge everyone to check his posting history.
A quick glance shows that you have never actually posted on a low market cap, potentially high growth stock - within the 4 page limit I can search anyway.
Ive noticed you have a "sell" sentiment on every stock you post on, with your reasoning generally being that no matter what else is going on with a stock ie profits or asset value, if the stock has any debt, any debt at all, its overvalued and should be avoided.
ie your comment on CSL, a $41 billion dollar company:
"Only deluded, brainwashed zombies think that some debt is good. All debt is bad no exception. Buying something you can not afford it, just because you want it. Is just stupid and non intelligent."
Do you think CSL would have gotten to where it is without any debt funding, ever?
You also have a sell on FMG, and you would have had a sell on FMG from 10c right up to $100 or whatever it hit at its peak before the share split.
Ive no doubt you are a successful shorter of stocks, and an apt long investor in your area of expertise, but stocks like RTA are clearly not within your area of expertise.
You also have a sell on NCM, because you think gold is headed towards $250.
You also have a sell sentiment on LNG, CGF, VOC, CBA, SRX, REA, SIR and every other stock you have posted on in your most recent 4 pages of posting history - all capitalised at over $1 billion.
Except AMP and MGX. You think AMP and MGX are buys.
At $300 million market cap MGX is the smallest company you have posted on.
You are missing out on some massive gains with your fear of debt and small caps my friend!
Expand
