Yes there are riskier jurisdictions, but how much of a premium can you attribute to these safer ounces? I agree with Rick Rule (a renowned and successful resource investor) when he says "I will take geopolitical risk over technical risk any day." Risk is also a function of price; If you overpay you 'risk' losing money. In light of this I would purchase RMS below 0.6c, however at these levels I would argue a lot of future catalysts are priced into its value; therefore it is wise to take at least some profits.
Lets juxtapose these two resource and reserve estimates: (this is only one company example)
RMS:
Add in reserves from Explaurum takeover.
Vs
I see dead money in the first at $600M MC. My argument is that RMS has risen 50% in 3 weeks on an index announcement. The company itself didn't double its resource ounces, their cash flow, or their profit in the last 3 weeks; so their ounces just got more expensive.
Where's The Pullback, page-88
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 91 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RMS (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.98 |
Change
0.030(1.54%) |
Mkt cap ! $2.514B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $2.01 | $2.02 | $1.96 | $6.338M | 3.200M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 55455 | $1.98 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.99 | 32563 | 2 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 15/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RMS (ASX) Chart |
