Where to now for long term investors of Telstra, page-6231

Grow Rich sry I thought u were referring to tls's past solar /wind investments.
hmm yep any investment tls makes to increase is presence in energy is very good.300mw's is reasonable.
They suggest one investment could power 220,000 regional homes.They suggest its their policy to become a more active participant in the energy market ?,what does that mean?.
Its all good even though i don't like wind and imo only solar absolutely has a place in the energy market but should not b on a massive scale for various reasons imo only.
But the more tls invests in energy the better ,although currently any energy they feed into the grid tls will obviously use use.

So i'm going to state my obvious response,all or most of tls's energy production from current agreements and this request by tls for tenders in the new 300mw plant imo only increases the chances of tls potentially investing in these nuclear modules in nsw if they become PC if lathams private members bill is successful.
imo the advantages ie ability to increase energy production by adding modules,its base load,tls clearly understands the threat energy costs are and forecast threat,no carbon emissions,reduced and reducing nuclear waste ie re use developments.I believe tls will do the maths and possibly get involved as political attitudes towards these no carbon emission modules change.
Bottom line,it may take time but latham could reduce that time drastically and i may get my tls energy retail division but probably when chairman retires or is replaced,penn ? maybe could b convinced then we have ben burge,i would b very interested in his opinion in the development of these modules.