I'm going to cut to the chase about this whole strange promenade Bob has aken us through the last 3 years.
1. In March/April 2007 Bob announced the was going to conduct and FLT. We could not produce a JORC resource until we dit it 2. Bob gave the expectation that the FLT would be conducted by Dec 2007 3. Ok we had delays with the approval process, though why it took over 2 years is beyond me. 4. We had the GFC, which was good for no-one, least of all uranium stockt. 5. FLT as approved in mid 2009. 6 We waited for the FLT to commence 7 Bob comes out with his JORC saying it might be amended in light of the FLT.....yeah OK, but you led everyone to believe it was not possible to get an accurate JORC, even inferred Bob... 8 July 2009. Additional PFN logging confirms the JORC deposit
9 We wait until the end of 2009 - no FLT constructions. In early 2010 Bob announces he has to re-consider the FLT, because costs are higher, and we might not need it anyway?.wait a minute this was something you had been telling us for almost three years is critical to the JORC process?..
10. Now we are getting a Field Recovery Trial ??..ok
11. Now the MARP has to be resubmitted?.but surely Bob this is less intrusive than the FLT is supposed to be ? and if there is a delay surely it just means a minor modification to the existing MARP?..however based on the current for my guess is 6 months +hey Bob?
12. But why are we doing this in the first place now? Are we simply just running around in circles? We have the JORC.
All these excuses for delay Bob, the circular and contorted arguments, make you look more tentative than a high school virgin on a first date - this might be understandable if you were a pimply 16yo, but you are a grown man Bob
Bob, Get on wit moving the project forward & stop this pussyfooting ? the spin is starting tro sound a bit..er. Ruddish.
CUY Price at posting:
18.0¢ Sentiment: LT Buy Disclosure: Held
