What is going on, page-10

It has been mentioned before, but I imagine its worth repeating, and i resisted saying this on those occasions.
The problem is this:
of all the applications that have ever been made where the acceptance of the "answers to questions" was delayed by (1/2 mnonths)... (which may or may not be indicative of the CHMP mindset re TIS's vitrogro...)
How many of those were accepted or rejected... (errr none of either AFAIK)

So our case is comparatively unique, in how it has been treated, and its history, so I am not sure past performance of different products is indicative of future performance of ours.

The committee already has demonstrated capability to do things I thought of before they did them but said to myself... nah they really cant do that option... (yet they did). I think they cant reject the application, I think it is a no brainer... they demonstrably hold different views on several things.
or
even the application/answers to questions quality from TIS is vastly different to what I confidently expect.

Either way I have factual evidence that at least some of my strongly held to be true assumptions were/are faulty. This puts me personally firmly in the territory of unknown levels of unknown stuff. That is not the territory I thought I was investing in when I started.
I think realistically I should bail on some of my holding due to material degradation of *my* certainty of outcome, but I really don't like letting the bastards (whoever they are win), because I am no less certain of the efficacy of the product, just of the integrity of the system and its ability to produce correct results.

YMMV: I hope mine does come the next seemingly "set in stone" deadline....