No, what he said aren't misleading, Kolosori PL was rejected and...

No, what he said aren't misleading, Kolosori PL was rejected and they "have requested a review of this decision, and may also seek judicial review for the rationale for its unsuccessful application as the determinations therein may not be based in law", the devil is in the details and how you "interpret" the letter of demand. He doesn't need to disclose this in detail, as this is already part of their review request, i.e. all the landowners agree so what has happened since then and can they legally do this in the last minute before signing it???

And on Tenement D, "The MMERE has requested further information and documentation for the Prospecting Licence Application and this has been supplied. It is expected the application will accordingly be approved", also how you "interpret" those letters from the lawyers representing those tribe/clan that own some of the land on Tenement D in question. He doesn't need to disclose this in details as MMERE has already requested as part of it.

That's how I read it.