In so far as the connotations you apply to yourself in your last...

In so far as the connotations you apply to yourself in your last paragraph in your post - and let them record show they are your words - Yes I do think that....... and here's why:-


The differences between you and I is that Yes I was indeed a shareholder of VIC and if a poster wishes to go back over my posts they will find that my comments are balanced, constructive and targeted to the interests of both VIC and HDY in so far as the current circumstances we find ourselves in. Your comments on the other hand are very different and I will let other posters make their own minds up and to go back and judge for themselves as to what your angle might be. Another difference is when you and your little mates on the other thread suggested I should stay away from that forum and not make any comments given I was a ' non holder ' of that stock.


So now after reading all your comments including the ones which were taken down , I personally maintain that you could not possibly be a holder of that stock in any significant way.


Apart from your rather random post you made on 2nd July 2018 which came in at a time when the HC banter in regards this other stock was somewhat teetering towards positive. Prior to this post , you then have to go back to April in and around the finalization of the Husky / Malamute / W.A tenement acquisitions. Strangely you are not then seen again until end of January as another infamous poster takes over the down ramping on the threads. After this brief tag team effort comprising 2 posts you then go silent again until Sept - Oct 2017 where you have a flurry of similar style posts around the Gold Conglomerate / Cobalt market euphoria and where you are still ramping the continuous negative posts. The best part of reviewing your posts was when you registered a staggering amount of entries with another poster back in Aug 2017 and during these posts you openly tried taking these conversations private and away from the HC public forum by supplying your email [email protected] with this other poster. IMO , these chronology's of your posts with huge time period gaps in-between do not represent an investor with a genuine or significant investment at stake. In fact even after your more recent post of 2nd July 2018 , you weren't seen until your post of 28th September 2018 which followed the 1st extension to the suspension On 14th September which followed the original trading halt of 7th September.


One has to ask themselves after reviewing all of this as to whether you simply just feed off of this sort of drama and the angst and suffering of other Investors. I invite anyone to to do as I have done and go back and check out all your posts.