I think the wall proved a lot. A lot of workers do not have a lot of savings in the US and most are not living the dream in a weak economy getting weaker due to immigration!!!.
The debt based ponzi scheme dependent on immigrants to jake up prices increasing the cost of living is failing.
Now what I find interesting about this Paddock guy is the rationale and something the puppet masters do not wish to talk about. Have a look at his apparent success, his age and his reason for dying. It would appear to me, as crazy as it seems he was thinking logically even if not productively a bit like the uni bomber suggesting social dysfunction caused by an economic malaise from a debt driven ponzi scheme. He was wealthy from real estate investing meaning the ponzi scheme propped up his credentials and put him on a pedestal he did not deserve where he lost motivation. At 64 I suppose he decided this was a good time to die, was a loner. I would argue the incentives provided by the banksters lead him to this because he did not need to do anything fulfilling and productive in life to succeed and ultimately he lost meaning in his life and sort infamy despite being accountable as an accountant knowing full well the repercussions.
I am not sure what the shock is about the 1974 school canteen menu. Maybe the shock is the need for price inflation and debt expansion required to prevent a major conflict like in WW11 since the globe went off the gold standard and the amount of regulatory intervention into our daily lives?
