Jem/BGWouldn't the loss circulation (at 2755) be consistent with...

Jem/BG

Wouldn't the loss circulation (at 2755) be consistent with capi breaking at that level (which typically sees pressure drop by between 500 and 1000psi)?

Wouldn't also the CH4 presence, with lack of HC, be consistent with dropping condensates, caused by a change in well dew points brought about by water coning?

{this line of thought leads also to the assumption that the reservoir is gas capped oil}

Both these logics would support the need for the apparent cautious approach ARQ are now taking (so that reverse coning can be conducted in order to avoid damage / cost).

Thoughts?

Kit