I read all your posts, do some research & post "details" to refute your claims as appropriate. Your linked article deliberately falsified the statistics, inflating the claim by some $5B. You rely on sophistry rather than factual discussion.
I had hoped that your comment above ("Do you imagine you have to shut down fossil fuel and replace it overnight? It's being replaced at a steady rate") where you abandoned the apparent aim to shut all coal mines tomorrow was a long awaited shift to a more balanced position.
Do you have some links to support your assertion that renewables aren't subsidised?
"Investments are made (both directly by the CEFC and indirectly through intermediaries) into eligible clean energy projects"
