So Gardie....."Grimaldi had knowledge therefore mmx had...

So Gardie....."Grimaldi had knowledge therefore mmx had knowledge"...does this follow that "barnes had knowledge therefore chm had knowledge"....You talk a lot of S*#&.....If someone in a position of authority in a coy is embezzling from it or dealing dodgily it doesnt follow that the coy automatically had knowledge..thats just plainly ridiculous....Grim as 1 director may have had knowledge but acting independently therefore the coy (MMX) itself Likely had no knowledge of his dealings..Just like I assume you will say thay CHM (the coy) had no knowledge of Barnes dealings.......