stolwyk,The point of this IMHO, is that TRO's resource is a much...

stolwyk,

The point of this IMHO, is that TRO's resource is a much higher quality resource, and from such TRO will have a much more profitable mine. If CBH are producing and worth around the $600M mark (with brokers saying $800M is an easy target long term with lower Zinc prices), then with TRO producing what will they be worth???

Due to the higher quality, one would have to value TRO at least 50% - 100% higher than CBH.... 10 bagger still to come IMHO...

Can't be done??? ZFX and KZL are examples of where TRO is headed...

Looking forward to Feburary.....

------------------

Taken from Resource Stocks Magazine


"Having seen an idea, and share price,
take off, investors will want to invest
in a similar-looking company to try
to replicate the same capital gains.
Zinc hopeful Tri Origin Minerals is
considered one of those possible lookalike
companies and its recent share
price surge suggests some investors have
already decided it is a story to their benefit
worth backing.
The Tri Origin story looks similar to the
early days' of Kagara Zinc - a magnificent
success story known to many stock market
investors familiar with the mining sector.
In the past several years, Kagara has
grown from pretty much nothing to a major
zinc producer with a market capitalisation
of $1.4 billion. It has focused its attention
on northem Queensland, building a series
of zinc mining operations around central
processing facilities and is now cashing in
on the record metals prices.
Tri Origin - even with its recent share
market spurt that has seen the stock surge
from 24c to a peak of 92c in the past
month - has a market capitalisation of $76
million.
As you can see, if Tri Origin can build a
story like Kagara and deliver results, there
remains significant upside.
But instead of northern Queensland, Tri
Origin is focused on the lachlan Fold belt of
New South Wales,about 200km from Sydney
and near the regionalcentre of Goulbum."