I agree. Had GPP been more reliable and trustworthy in their communication it would perhaps give some investor company a sense of confidence in what is or isn't there and may have been possible takers if GPP decided to farm out. While someone may argue the Lab results are there, a proper and reliable report of their assessment would also be helpful. Example of it is J Watts' leaves anyone to only think of two possibilities of his findings there;
1- Some doughnuts and
2- Nothing to speak,
... given we did not hear of the outcome of his visit. Although given the timing it is clear that they just sent him there to there was a pressure/expectation by the shareholders for him to actually do something.
P.S. just a well the couch was there otherwise he would have perhaps extend his visit by a few more days to also find the couch. ..
Or did he REALLY go there at all? ... maybe some expenditure could be itemed in annual cost as his visit was not going to result in much perhaps anyway!!
