top 20, page-8

NB, thanks for raising the fair balance issue.
I have said before that I have valued some aspects of RB's contribution and as others have agreed he seems by his posts to come across as a "good bloke". I must say though that I also feel FX and K's frustration, dismay and despondency at the inexplicable failure to answer specific and reasonable governance concerns. It has been RB himself (or herself) who has set up the expectation of having the ear of certain board members and therefore the implied ability to be able to answer or at least clarify some of the outstanding questions.
The questions that have been asked here have been pretty much without venom and certainly no personal attack on RB was intended by my posts.
I for one am still enough of an optimist to continue to hope that the company won't run out of cash before some product starts to flow from the Singapore plant. Equally it seems only fair to link board and executive reward to tangible results.
I hope down the track we will be in a position to agree with the analyst who told me that JM was the right man for the job and in particular that he has the ability to present the complex value proposition that is NSP in a way that can be understood by lay people.
Good luck to all.