top 20 shareholders, page-4

Starmanwin,
Not grasping at straws, just making an interesting observation, that the top twenty holders had changed dramatically in two years which happened to include Aminex.
If Aminex needed to sell their 2,000,000 shares in KEY for funding other projects then we are in bed with a cot case!
I however will continue to post negative sentiment re KEY until i can either sell my holding to break even or heaven forbid, KEY actually make some positive progression on their projects to ensure a reasonable return to their shareholders.
Their projections for the 2009 year were not achieved by any stretch of the imagination and at this point, 2010 does not appear to look any rosier!!!
As an example, what has happened to the sysmic results that were completed months ago, if they have not got to a stage where they can now release that info to their shareholders then they need to have a good look at their own performance.
Maybe the lack of progress on their projects is one of the reasons why the top twenty shareholders has changed to the extent it has in the past two years, ie they also were not impressed with KEY's performance and have moved their money to greener pastures?
I bought into KEY because after doing my research i thought they had enormous potential with their projects and KEN's confidence of bringing KN#1 into early commercialisation, none of these have happened and so the shareprice continues to remain well below the listing price.
Good luck
dapper