I probably would have bought back in on the results expect for what I read in Section 6. Receiver appointed to a customer of the finance division. Amount owed $440k which will be recoverable through asset sales, insurance and an agreement with directors to underwrite any shortfall.
It's not sustainable to have the directors underwrite a loss. Any losses need to go through the P&L as they are a normal part of lending money. So my initial view is they are propping up NPAT by under-provisioning
Tomorro, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
