I was referring to 'possible suitors', i.e. a company takeover. They would need to get something like 90% of the shares for a compulsory acquisition and I realise that will never happen because of Toyota Tsusho (unless it is them of course, but that has been discussed elsewhere). I think I was waxing lyrical more than being realistic.
I know selling into a share buy-back is voluntary. I don't necessarily support a share buy-back, I'm not sure they have a very good track record. Happy to be corrected though.
If I were management I'd be wondering which of the significant shareholder nominees is loaning out shares which are being used for shorting the company.
CAPITAL STRUCTURE
As at 5 March 2018
Ordinary shares issued and outstanding: 260,710,716 (ASX & TSX combined)
Unlisted Performance Rights: 2,092,367
Exercise price $0.00; expiration dates 30 September 2018 – 30 September 2020
SIGNIFICANT SHAREHOLDERS (AS OF 14 AUGUST, 2017)
1
Rank
Name
Units
% of Units
2
1.
JP Morgans Nominees Australia Limited
55,663,401
26.44
3
2.
HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited
36,132664
17.16
4
3.
Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited
10,670,492
5.07
5
4.
Canadian Register Control
9,141,929
4.34
6
5.
BNP Paribas Noms Pty Ltd (DRP)
7,354,552
3.49
7
6.
National Nominees Limited
5,665,596
2.69
8
7.
Lithium Investors LLC
5,534,739
2.63
9
8.
National Nominees Limited (DB A/C)
5,262,969
2.50
10
9.
Richard Seville & Associates Pty Ltd (The Seville Super Account)