today's australian, page-19

That sort of an ann. deserves a gaol sentence, $6 billion fully secured.

Why are you pretending to be a dim wit?
How many shares were bought on the 11th, from open 'till the next enforced T/H?

"The shares in pdy went on suspension on the 09/04/14 and there was a trading halt, after the ‘secured funding announcement’ was made on 11/04/14; so no shares / almost no shares traded between 09/04/14 and 30/04/14???"

TRY ...196,582,030 Quite a few, at probably an average of 4cents. That's nearly $8mill. Opened at 4.5 and ended at 3.2cents. And on what basis did they rise from .4cents to 2cents?????

That post ranks in almost the same category as the ann. of the 11th.

At the end of the day, it makes no difference how many.
Even if only 1 person, lost only $500, because of a false and misleading ann. the people that released the ann. need to be held accountable, and the 1 person should get his $500 bucks back.

"where is the case for litigation???"

You might have a shield for the most posts, but it's certainly not for the 'cleverest of posts'.

The case for litigation is in the fact that the ann. was NOT TRUE.