Im not even going engaging with your pathetic post apart from...

Im not even going engaging with your pathetic post apart from this which is all I will say on the matter;

Do you honestly think management didnt do everything in the power to try get ineligible shareholders on a level playing field without affecting the other ~1,300,000,000 shares that Australians hold?

Protect the 0.01% value of shareholders at the expenses of the other 99.99% of holders. By the sounds of it, unsurprisingly, you and Thomas would have made a ridiculously amateurish choice. The shares are in CG hands and not in any way controlled by A40, so they have no say what way they get sold. They have a business to run for the 99.99%.

Is it unfortunate for certain offshore holders, yes it is (many would no doubt have chosen to sell out and could now buy back in with a far higher number of shares with the same $ value and are in a much better position there was plenty of choices) but thats investing if you win more than you lose you are doing extremely well, roll with the punches, conduct better due diligence or play another game.