and i presume that the third party taking on the lease from tod will tell the mis investors that if they wish to sublease the property in the future that they can pay double, the rent that tim was charging. otherwise they can pay for permission to put the bulldozer in to remove "their trees". would not be a good look to be trespassing on the third parties land without permission,
hold timg
and i presume that the third party taking on the lease from tod...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
