Rob When mud logs indicated that the well was running "40 - 50...

Rob
When mud logs indicated that the well was running "40 - 50 ft higher than expected" ,
followed by "While the Cris R IV sand was intersected 244 ft updip from the
Simineaux #1, the unit appears to have been already swept."

I believe there would have been a few raised eyebrows amongst the Houston
3D Seismic Team , this being the case.

I'm not surprised at all that a Side track is being considered. Maybe it was always
a possibility.
Go for it.

BTW, Desiree Ann 18 Dec 2012 - With reference to Cris R II and III
This is a proven productive fault block with a strong water drive in the primary objectives. The
prospect has a significant oil column and long life production potential and was generated from
3D seismic and subsurface support for up-dip attic structure


How "Wet" are Louise Cris R sands ?

Punters should Trawl the Anns and make their own judgement on
Hold'em or Fold'em
The Dealin' ain't Done Yet , by a very long way.
MHO only.

CH$$RS
R15