This will be my last post in ESR, page-73

and how have you proved me wrong? You spoke to someone? Who? Why should anyone believe what you've said. I presented some facts. And answer me this, what would be the point of showing close up photos of hand specimens in their announcements if the spodumene and Li minerals weren't identifiable? Seems pointless to me if you are right and it's impossible to identify the mineral by eye, which seems highly unlikely (see my photos of the man sized spodumene logs). Quartz is the second most abundant mineral on earth and is easily identifiable, feldspar is the third and also easy to identify, I don't think any geologist would get spodumene mixed up for either of those minerals. They may have trouble distinguishing between Li baring minerals like spodumune and lepidolite but there are spectral contact probes that can be used for that purpose to get real time results. Tell us why it's impossible for geologists to identify spodumene and other Li baring minerals in rocks, then you could actually be adding some value. These are questions that are important to everyone who wants to continue investing in this junior end of this sector, so casting doubt and confusion over this is not helping anyone on these forums. Come clean with your source or some facts. Esh