This will be my last post in ESR, page-133

And now all we have are insignificant sections. That's how they should have stayed all along IMO. Some minor assaying could have been done on the more prospective sections of core if they were in doubt and for due diligence purposes before hanging those cores in front of the market as significant and wasting the time and money. Those cores are barren of lithium minerals in a "significant" way, people trying to defend or paint an alternative picture should re-check the assay results. The mineralisation we are searching for is not a fine grained gold it is a volumetrically "significant" portion of the rock that IMO should have been seen and if unsure tested in far more simple ways than assaying and splitting the entire core. How significant are the few rock chips this company now hinges on? That is anyone's guess, my guess is that the chances of them being significant are very low. Unfortunately in this market it is buyer be ware. If investors stopped taking these types of knocks every time we could balance the odds and make it seller be ware. But the chance of that is Buckleys as not many people see that pushing back on the system is the answer in the extreme cases. Speculation is necessary in the junior explorer market or else new mines would never be found and funded, but where anomalies seem to exist they should be questioned and companies need to be accountable. We are shareholders after all. Why would I not be entitled to know when the assay data was first received by the company? It is not a fact that should be hidden from shareholders in the current circumstance. Esh