So the GBP directors have cross holdings in Tower. How are they...

So the GBP directors have cross holdings in Tower. How are they Tower's cash cow? That was your claim. What I can see is GBP fund the first well, to farm-in and it fails. To retain their 25% they pay 25% of the next, while Tower pays 75%. I don't see how GBP is Tower's cash cow. The likely options for a third well would be a farm-out or GBP bank-roll the well for greater interest. Should GBP bank roll a potential third well (looking likely) then your claim can be substantiated. Till then, like mak said, rubbish.