Could you please give us the source of your comment,Iam aware of an article that states the ins and outs of an MIS scheme,and there is at present or was in the NSW supreme court,that was arguing were the trees part of the scheme or are they seperate,and understand in the paper work from Gunns on the 2004/5,in WA it has to paseed through the WA land ACT 1894,
The article I am referring to is called -The DNA of an MIS Scheme.It has been posted on this site and forum
Iam of the belief that another RE sucks,especially on e pushed by the banks,that is not in my interest and I am in 3 schemes all on non leased land,but I am happy to burn it on the basis that we will get nothing anyway
GTP Price at posting:
12.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held