#theroadto10000 have we reached 100 yet?, page-146

As you say, we will never know the truth. But facts do get twisted to support the tint of one's glasses. The negotiations for acquisition began apparently in September. About the time that Ohm was tracking to deliver more sales than cumulatively before. And Ohm attributable revenue (by deduction) for the quarter ending September (reported in Oct 4C) appeared to more than double the revenue attributable to Ohm in the preceeding quarter. These attributable numbers have been posted before. And of course, we know that as "an annuity business" these revenues correspond to units sold, installed and generating recurring fees. Not sure if that is ipso factor or if it is quod erat demonstradum, but suffice to say it casts huge shadow on credibility to the theory that the acquisition occurred when it did primarily as some sort of cover up.