The way I see it., page-14

Hi Rev

I wasn't quite asking that question, but that answer will suffice. It seems a very inefficient process whereby they can only ask one set of questions that we get to answer before the allotted time runs out and we have to go through a process of presenting and endorsing outstanding issues, and start the clock all over again. It seems far more efficient that they ask (and we answer) as many questions as possible in the allotted time. Moreover it would be be manifestly unfair if they come up with completely new questions that they could have asked the first time around but chose not to

I've waited 5 years...what's a few more!

cheers

GL