Share
7,772 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 32
clock Created with Sketch.
24/03/19
19:47
Share
Originally posted by jopo:
↑
I am making out that your past assertions that the wavering polar vortex is a result of increasing CO2 is in complete contradiction to the observations and modeling observed by the IPCC The IPCC have stated that amongst other things on the polar vortex that a cooling stratosphere is consistent with a tighter polar vortex. And as previously posted we are ALL very well aware that a wavy polar vortex is due to a stratospheric warming event or a warmer stratosphere. It is not rocket science and you are yet to post a IPCC report that tell us according to them the polar vortex weakening is a result of a cooling stratosphere which is consistent with increasing CO2.
Expand
That's fine jopo. You keep asserting a contradiction and I keep asserting that what you think are contradictions are likely not. But I'll check it out further when I have the time. The last IPCC report was 2014 based on science preceeding it's publication. So we have 5 years further work on these things. Including the references I have posted.
Originally posted by jopo:
↑
I am making out that your past assertions that the wavering polar vortex is a result of increasing CO2 is in complete contradiction to the observations and modeling observed by the IPCC The IPCC have stated that amongst other things on the polar vortex that a cooling stratosphere is consistent with a tighter polar vortex. And as previously posted we are ALL very well aware that a wavy polar vortex is due to a stratospheric warming event or a warmer stratosphere. It is not rocket science and you are yet to post a IPCC report that tell us according to them the polar vortex weakening is a result of a cooling stratosphere which is consistent with increasing CO2.
Expand