Share
7,772 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 32
clock Created with Sketch.
23/03/19
18:00
Share
Originally posted by jopo:
↑
You poor sod. I did not infer that at all. I have merely pointed out that CO and AGW have NO correlation at all to the polar vortex. So mjp back to stratospheric cooling. Are you asserting what? 1. That the stratosphere is not cooling in the northern hemisphere hence why we are seeing a commencement of a wobbly polar vortex or, 2. That the the stratosphere is in fact cooling in the Northern Hemisphere but the PHYSICS is different? of course there could be other option that the IPCC has not even considered yet. But please you have to enlighten us as to where in the IPCC they have discussed a expanding polar vortex is a result of CO2. Please dont tell us to accept your interpretation. WE ARE ALL seeking the interpretation of the IPCC. I have put forth there historical observations and in fact there future scenarios using models. And both do not agree with the alarmist and bull sheeple Mr Mjp
Expand
That you think you've shown there is no correlation between "CO and AGW and the polar vortex" is your fundamental irrational problem. There are better things to do than waste any part of a Saturday evening arguing with someone who doesn't have a clue, but thinks they know more than the world's climate scientists.