Does anyone have any insight into how the Fugro/Skyline offering...

Does anyone have any insight into how the Fugro/Skyline offering may compare with Nearmaps?

The new partnership offers clients an integrated oblique viewing and 3D modelling software. The integration of TerraExplorer and PX Mapper transforms the application of 3D environments by using 2D oblique imagery to create high-resolution building models that are both realistic and spatially accurate.

Fugro’s oblique mapping solution includes high-resolution 360-degree oblique imagery and the PX Mapper visualisation and analysis software. The Fugro/Skyline alliance allows oblique customers to experience Skyline’s automated modelling technology along with TerraExplorer’s optimised analytics capabilities including terrain analysis for flooding, contours, slope and volume metrics, lines of sight and view shed queries and shadow analysis.

Does Nearmaps offering appear to be competing directly with this, or does this out perform Nearmaps, or can this sort of comparison only be done once they are being assessed side by side. I have a basic understanding of GIS, but thought someone with significant hands on knowledge maybe able to provide a more nuanced view.