Regardless of where the idea originally came from, it was ultimately shareholders who voted in favour of Cedric's performance bonus, a bonus that only benefits him, yet he did not get it across the line on his own.
1st Sam are our biggest shareholder, they don't make a ROI until the SP goes up and they get diluted to hell as well, their interests are 100% aligned with us punters.
To all those banging on about Cedric being hopeless, snouts at the trough, cash grabs, directors rorting shareholders, etc, please answer me this...
Why did 1st Sam vote in favour of Cedric's performance bonus?
Regardless of where the idea originally came from, it was...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
