She is not using the 2014/15 data for $ analysis, more as a guide to % so not really misrepresented at all. The 1.6 mill cap would not have much affect on the %.
The $ figure she did use INCLUDES the 1.6 million cap.
So not ‘fake news” at all.
The AGE....Caitlin whatevers, page-7
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 44 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
