Because I give my opinions of the technicals and they are negative this constitutes downramping?
Your following statement is literally "technically speaking can be interpreted in a couple of different ways". Why contradict yourself that harshly and quickly?
I'm dodging your questions because of what I just said, but I will repeat it because it appears you need 5 or 6 times to get it through - this thread is to discuss technicals, don't rebutt with statements on fundamentals lol. How many times does one need to type out the same thing?
If only I came across this stock last month and was able to save a few holders a buck or two from buying at $5. Hopefully some realise its way overpriced at this levels. $3 short term IMO DYOR
Technically Speaking, page-802
Add PO3 (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
22.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $7.078M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| PO3 (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable