I have read media and I have seen direct copying of text. Have you seen true reporting wih independent research?
You said "The first $4.6m is not cash?". Is it cash as it appears not.
You said "The second $4.6m is not cash?". What second $4.6m is that?
I don't understand half of what you talk about?
Where did you get the $10m revenue from? Please show me, because if it exists, then we're really rocking an rolling and the share price will be 20c+++++. BUT the revenue must be real, meaning real cash from outside of NSP subsidiaries and not pretend money from revaluing assets like was done with BioEnquire. And the real profits need to go to shareholders, not bonuses.
Otherwise, who told you that there was $10m revenue?
Actualy, I don't understand anything that you talk about???
Repeating the talk from the management doesn't make it true. Substantiating it does. So far, you are really good at repeating what is already said in statements. We can all read. We can't all ask good questions.
I await substantive answers to the questions that many have posted here.
MEM Price at posting:
7.3¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
