You were happy to exit STO as was pear. What else had changed...

You were happy to exit STO as was pear.

What else had changed since other than a third party may put an offer in?

In effect you are arguing that you should have been prevented from making your own decision as in hindsight you were wrong.

More importantly you don't understand a Board's duties re appropriate disclosure. Outside us arguing from a holder or aggrieved prior holder perspective can you point to a serious independent piece of analysis (by broker or business columnist) that says the STO directors got this wrong?