the announcements dated 11 july 2006 seem to be a bit of a worry for smm's position
how would they be if they were the ones to be found to be in material breach and end up with nothing?
smm seems to have a naive view of the rigours of litigation which they will most likely reconsider very shortly
perhaps they are sore not to be offered a 41% premium that the VUL shareholders received
the fun of the fair
the announcements dated 11 july 2006 seem to be a bit of a worry...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SMM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.123M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | 0.3¢ | $381 | 127.0K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | 18298666 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 540108 | 3 |
| Last trade - 13.06pm 27/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SMM (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
