Ceto 4 deviated a long way from the original concept developed by CWE.
The main difference was that it was made up of interlocking plastic panels which made it buoyant. Because it was buoyant, it had to be dragged below the surface rather than submerging by filling with water as is the case with Ceto 3,5 and 6.
As mc stated, it lacked a fail/safe mechanism as well.
This image should give you an idea of what not to do in building a buoyant actuator.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- State of Play
Ceto 4 deviated a long way from the original concept developed...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CCE (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
3.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.91M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 200491 | 4.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.0¢ | 6497 | 1 |
Last trade - 09.08am 20/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
CCE (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable