Tomboy,
You can have the largest mills and the largest tailings dams, as you will pay for their upkeep and operation.
We've heard you, but we will stick with high quality ore bodies, which inherently need smaller mills, smaller tailings dams, less roads and much lower costs. They make money for shareholders. Posters are here because they like these things small, they are attracted to quality or bodies and will not be deterred by the pestilent posting, whether by trolls or by pitiful, self-hurt, illogical investors.
Why would anyone who expected a flood of low cost nickel in 2017 ( not quite supported by the facts) be investing in an already struggling producer ( who shareholder don't seem to still properly own) and in the longest wannabe story in WA nickel whose greatest producing hope they plan to restart up on nickel above USD6.50 ( whether still owned by shareholders, or by CN holders or banks or whatever).
Give us all a break, we've already inspected the pound and found it wanting. Your rants lack logic or coherence, and are quite factually challenged.
EL
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Speculation mounts re Sirius' Independence
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)