I think it's right that we maintain the rage. The board and its directors have/had a duty of care towards us. They need to regain (or gain) our confidence. While we took the board at its word that certain matters were confidential, they completely lost (for me) any last vestige of confidence in their transparency when they were not going to let us know the huge costs that AGS was ordered to pay to Q and Heathgate. Misleading and deceptive intentions ? Ironic? Pot calling the kettle black ?
AGS Price at posting:
3.4¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held