Nothing adds up and for that reason I have no trust in AGS...

Nothing adds up and for that reason I have no trust in AGS management. How hostile were they to their own shareholders during AGMs. Why? Were they feeling guilty or on the defensive as they had something to hide?

I'd like to know why Ian Pamensky quit? Did he have a problem with the way the company was run? Did he have higher morals and a conscience.

Disclaimer: I am in no way implying any unconscionable behaviour was undertaken by any directors during the massive destruction of shareholder wealth. Maybe they are just hopeless at running a public company? Don't bother suing me, you've already taken all my money.