You surprise me that you stand by that post. You tried to...

You surprise me that you stand by that post.
You tried to ridicule and your comment was naive.
The volumes before the day you singled out and the volumes post your comment clearly told a story you were oblivious to.
It was not about the share price it was about the volumes.
Had it not been new buyers and for whatever reason seeing some value and soaking up Michael James shares then the share price could have tanked back down to 005 and 6s like it was before people saw some value in the shell. The Top 20 has consolidated even with Michael James selling 6m shares. That is noteworthy. Is is positive? Well its certainly not negative. My point would be obvious to most but you and one or two others.
I don't need to make you seem misguided you do that yourself.
All I do is I stick to the current facts and don't constantly air baggage because that is what will count.