Solgold takeover price-$19.5b-Macroaxis, page-31

Father Ted

Please do not digress. I said that if you cited something so big of $1 trillion of minerals for N.Dynasty, then you should post a link. This is standard in London and the USA. Now, I have found to my horror of the situation and that if I had not checked, I would be under a wrong impression that $1 trillion of minerals has not been reflected in the mkt cap of the co ie N.Dynasty. From the links I cited, there is litigation, no permit and now a official filing from the co that it is not sure that the mineral is economic? [See my link]

Now, you post a link to Rick Rule on Cornerstone Resources who are the 15% holders of ENSA and Solgold 85% of ENSA.

How is that relevant and digressing from what we were talking about?

So you now have no issue with 3% of $645.8 billion = $19.9 billion since it is simple maths and you take no issue with Macroaxis who provided the figure from published public figures.

So, is the issue with me personally? I ask because whenever, I am asked a question and I provide research, you come up with continual answers but at each stage now, you digress to something else.

I think that in London, this is not acceptable and I will stop here since I have fully explained my position and for clarity.

As said, please direct your questions or dissatisfaction to all the experts I cited via the research articles and to Solgold ITSELF who provided the figures in the first place.

With due respect.