That's misleading at best. The 2015 target was reduced because the RET was based on X GWh of clean energy and energy demand declined since 2008 so therefore the GWh amount was revised to meet approx 20% emissions reduction.
Ideally I'd like to see all subsidies axed. RET and STC. Renewables will *eventually* be cheap in their own right, no need to pump up IFN to achieve that.
That's misleading at best. The 2015 target was reduced because...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
