sla discussion opens on hc, page-9

I have to disagree with you Kaunas about your assertion that Vagif holds a deep obligation to do the right thing for shareholders. There are numerous examples where this is patently false, one such example is the money Vagif received from the payout of the ANZ/OPES prime debacle should have been put back in to the company, strangely it wasn't. Another example was the failure to proceed with internet sales. Don't get me wrong I like and buy their products, and I hope the company does manage to relist and also prosper for the sake of long suffering shareholders. To believe that Vagif is doing this for anyone but himself is wrong.

Regards C