Guys what you also have to realise is that from a non commercial standpoint, Skaergaard is of a high importance to the actual understanding of global geology (Ingenious petrology, Layering and Fractional crystalisation) Many geologist come to study it every year to gain an understanding of geology as it is seen by many geologist as a perfect sequence of historical geological events and look at it as the perfect specimen. The question becomes does the Greenland government want to actually monetise it, or do they see that as heritage? Don't know the answer to this, but this may become a talking point and larger mining groups may consider this as one element when weighing up their risk.
I doubt this is the case, but youd def need to consider it
